Calendar Contact Us Site Map
About NCCEPPrograms & ServicesPolicy & AdvocacyEventsResource CenterWhat's New(s)

Educate to Legislate
 

Understanding the Process
  

Federal Appropriations
  

Authorization vs. Appropriations
 

Key Committees & Subcommittees

Legislative Updates

Take Action

NCCEP Advocacy Toolkit

Higher Education Opportunity Act

NCCEP Blogs
            

Print this Page

Understanding the Federal Budget Appropriations Process

Introduction

Congress annually considers 13 or more appropriations measures that provide funding for a variety of activities, such as national defense, education, disaster assistance, crime prevention programs, and general government operations, e.g., the administration of most federal agencies. Certain rules and practices devised by Congress for the consideration of appropriations measures are referred to collectively as the appropriations process.

Generally, the appropriations process includes the following:

• the annual appropriations cycle;

• spending ceilings for appropriations associated with the annual budget resolution; and

• prohibitions against certain language (in appropriations measures) that violates separation of the authorization and appropriations functions into separate measures.

In considering appropriations measures, Congress exercises the power granted to it by the Constitution, which states, “No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law ....” The power to appropriate is exclusively legislative. The executive branch may not spend more than the amount appropriated, and it may use available funds only for the purposes established by Congress.

By virtue both of his constitutional power to approve or veto entire measures and of the various duties imposed upon him by statute, such as submitting an annual budget to Congress, the President also has an important role in the appropriations process.

Following is a brief synopsis of the annual appropriations cycle, spending ceilings, and the relationship between authorization and appropriations measures.

Annual Appropriations Cycle

PRESIDENT SUBMITS BUDGET

The President initiates the appropriations process by submitting to Congress his annual budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The President is required to submit his annual budget on or before the first Monday in February. (On occasion, Congress has extended the deadline, statutorily or informally.)

Because Congress provides budget authority rather than cash to agencies, the President recommends spending levels for the government’s various programs and agencies in the form of budget authority , or BA. Budget authority represents the legal authority for federal agencies to make obligations that usually result in expenditures (or outlays). These obligations (for example, entering into a contract to construct a ship or purchase supplies) usually result in outlays—payments from the Treasury—typically in the form of checks, electronic funds transfers, or cash disbursements.

Generally, appropriations are a type of budget authority. Appropriations measures provide new budget authority (as opposed to previously enacted budget authority). Typically, appropriations must be obligated in the fiscal year for which they are provided.

Not all new budget authority provided for a fiscal year is expended that year. For example, outlays may occur over several years, until a project is completed:

• FY2003, no outlays;

• FY2004, $40 million;

• FY2005, $40 million;

• FY2006, $40 million.

In this scenario, a total of $120 million in outlays is spent over four fiscal years. As Congress considers appropriations measures providing new budget authority for a particular fiscal year, discussions on the resulting outlays only involve estimates. Data on the actual outlays for a fiscal year are not available until the fiscal year has ended.

When the President submits his budget to Congress, the agencies provide detailed justification materials to the House and Senate appropriations subcommittees, which have jurisdiction over funding for the particular agencies. In the case of GEAR UP, the Department of Education is responsible for providing a recommended funding level as well as funding justification.

CONGRESS ADOPTS BUDGET RESOLUTION

The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as amended (the Congressional Budget Act), requires Congress to adopt an annual budget resolution. In the 27 fiscal years in which it has considered budget resolutions, Congress has adopted a budget resolution in every year but two (FY1999 and FY2003). There is no penalty if a budget resolution is not completed.

Usually, the budget resolution is Congress’s response to the President’s budget. The budget resolution must cover at least five fiscal years: the upcoming fiscal year plus four additional fiscal years. The budget resolution is never sent to the President, nor does it become law. It does not provide spending authority or raise or lower revenues but instead is a guide for Congress to use as it considers various budget bills, including appropriations and tax measures.

The budget resolution sets total new budget authority and outlay levels for each fiscal year covered by the resolution. It also distributes federal spending among 19 functional categories, e.g., national defense, agriculture, transportation, etc., and sets similar levels for each function. The resolution includes revenue floors for each fiscal year.

Total new budget authority and outlays are distributed among both the House and Senate committees with jurisdiction over spending, thereby setting spending ceilings for each committee.

The Congressional Budget Act provides an April 15 deadline for final congressional adoption of the budget resolution. However, Congress frequently does not meet this deadline, and there is no penalty if it is not met.

The Congressional Budget Act generally prohibits House or Senate floor consideration of revenue or spending measures for a fiscal year until Congress adopts the budget resolution. However, even if the budget resolution is not in place, the House may begin considering regular appropriations bills after May 15 without violating the act. No such provision exists in the Senate.

TIMETABLE FOR CONSIDERATION OF REGULAR APPROPRIATIONS MEASURES

Traditionally, the House of Representatives has initiated consideration of regular appropriations measures. The House Appropriations Committee has jurisdiction over appropriations measures and usually has begun the legislative process by reporting the 13 regular appropriations bills separately to the full House.

Recently, both the House Appropriations Committee and the Senate Appropriations Committee (which has jurisdiction over appropriations measures in the Senate) have been reporting the regular appropriations bills in May or June. The House committee completes all or almost all of the bills by the annual August recess; the Senate measures typically are reported prior to the August recess or in September.

During the fall, the appropriations committees usually are heavily involved in conferences to resolve differences between the two chambers’ bills. Relatively little or no time remains before the fiscal year begins to resolve what may be wide disparities between the House and Senate, to say nothing of those between Congress and the President. Congress usually is faced with the need to enact one or more temporary continuing resolutions pending final disposition of the regular appropriations bills.

TIMING OF APPROPRIATIONS CONSIDERATION AND THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT

The Congressional Budget Act establishes a timetable for the consideration of appropriation legislation.

April 15                    Adoption of the budget resolution.

May 15                    Annual appropriation bills may be considered in the House.

June 10                   House Appropriations Committee reports last annual appropriation bill.

June 30                   House completes action on annual appropriation bills.

October 1                Fiscal year begins [all appropriations actions to be completed].

The deadlines focus on the House because the conventional pattern for consideration of appropriations is for the House to originate the measures; this works to ensure timely consideration by the House, the Senate, and conference committees.

WORK OF THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES

After the President submits his budget, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees hold full committee and subcommittee hearings on the segments of the budget under their jurisdiction. The 13 appropriations subcommittees in each house hold more detailed hearings on the agencies’ justifications, obtaining testimony primarily from agency officials and, occasionally, from public witnesses.

TYPES OF APPROPRIATIONS MEASURES

Annually, Congress considers 13 regular appropriations bills that correspond to the 13 appropriations subcommittees in the House and Senate:

• Agriculture;

• Commerce, Justice, State, The Judiciary;

• Defense;

District of Columbia;

• Energy and Water Development;

• Foreign Operations;

• Homeland Security;

• Interior;

• Labor, Health and Human Services, Education (bill containing GEAR UP);

• Legislative Branch;

• Military Construction;

• Transportation, Treasury, Independent Agencies; and

• Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, Independent Agencies.

Each appropriations subcommittee has jurisdiction over one regular appropriations bill, with the House and Senate appropriations subcommittees sharing jurisdiction over the same agencies and programs. For example, the House and Senate Labor/HHS/Ed appropriations subcommittees have jurisdiction over federal spending for these agencies.

After the hearings have been completed and the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have received their committee spending ceilings from the budget resolution, the House and Senate appropriations subcommittees begin to mark up the regular bills under their jurisdiction and report them to their respective full committees. Each committee considers each of its subcommittee’s recommendations separately. The committees may adopt amendments to a subcommittee bill and then report the bill as amended to their respective floors for action.

Recently, the Senate Appropriations Committee has reported either original Senate regular appropriations bills or substitute amendments replacing the texts of the House-passed bills.

HOUSE AND SENATE FLOOR ACTION

After the House or Senate Appropriations Committee reports an appropriations bill, the bill is brought to the floor.

At this point, Representatives or Senators are provided an opportunity to propose floor amendments to the bill.

House—Prior to floor consideration of a regular appropriations bill, the House generally considers a special rule reported by the House Rules Committee setting parameters for floor consideration of the bill. If the House adopts the special rule, it usually considers the appropriations bill immediately.

The House considers the bill in the Committee of the Whole, of which all Representatives are members. A special rule on an appropriations bill usually provides for one hour of general debate on the bill. The debate includes opening statements by the chairman and ranking minority member of the appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the regular bill, as well as other interested Representatives.

After the Committee of the Whole debates the bill, it considers amendments. Amendments must meet the following requirements:

• House standing rules and precedents: for example, amendments must be germane to the bill;

• authorization-appropriations process, which enforces the relationship between authorization and appropriations measures in the congressional budget process; and

• special rule providing for consideration of the particular bill.

If an amendment violates any of these requirements, any Representative may raise a point of order to that effect. If the presiding officer rules the amendment out of order, it cannot be considered on the House floor. The special rule may waive any of these requirements, thereby allowing the House to consider the amendment.

During consideration of individual regular appropriations bills, the House sometimes sets additional parameters, either by adopting a special rule or by unanimous consent. The House agrees to the parameters only if no Representative objects. For example, the House sometimes agrees to limit debate on individual amendments by unanimous consent.

After the Committee of the Whole completes consideration of the measure, it reports the bill with any adopted amendments to the full House. The House then votes on the adopted amendments and passage. After House passage, the bill is sent to the Senate.

Senate—The full Senate considers the bill as reported by its Appropriations Committee. The Senate does not utilize the device of a special rule to set parameters for consideration of bills. Before taking up the bill, however, or during its consideration, the Senate sometimes sets parameters by unanimous consent.

When the bill is brought up on the floor, the chairman and ranking minority member of the appropriations subcommittee make opening statements on the contents of the bill as reported.

Committee and floor amendments to the reported bills must meet requirements under the Senate standing rules and precedents, the authorization-appropriations process, and the congressional budget process. The specifics of the Senate and House requirements differ. As in the House, the Senate sometimes waive some of these rules.

When the Senate Appropriations Committee reports a Senate bill and after the full Senate has completed action on it, the Senate waits for the House to send its bill to the Senate and amends the House-passed bill with usually a substitute amendment that contains the text of the Senate bill as amended on the Senate floor.

HOUSE AND SENATE CONFERENCE ACTION

Members include those of the House and Senate appropriations subcommittees having jurisdiction over a particular regular appropriations bill, the chairmen of the full committees, and the ranking minority members of the full committees. Members of both houses meet to negotiate differences between the House- and Senate-passed bills.

Under House and Senate rules, the negotiators (or conferees or managers) typically are required to remain within the scope of the differences between the positions of the two chambers. Their agreement must be within the range established by the House- and Senate-passed versions. For example, if the House-passed bill appropriates $3 million for a program and a separate Senate amendment provides $5 million, the conferees must reach an agreement that is within the $3–5 million range. However, these rules are not always followed.

When the Senate passes a single substitute amendment to a House bill, the conferees must reach agreement on all points of difference between the House and Senate versions before reporting the conference report in agreement to both houses. When this occurs, the conferees propose a new conference substitute for the bill as a whole. Conferees attach a joint explanatory statement (or managers’ statement) explaining the new substitute.

By tradition, the House usually considers conference reports on appropriations measures first. The first house to consider a conference report has the option of voting to recommit the report to the conference for further consideration to reject the conference report, or adopt it. After the first house adopts the conference report, the conference is automatically disbanded, leaving the second house two options: to adopt or to reject the conference report. Conference reports cannot be amended.

If the conference report is rejected or recommitted by the first house, the conferees negotiate further over the matters in dispute. The measure cannot be sent to the President until both houses have agreed to the entire text of the bill.

PRESIDENTIAL ACTION

After Congress sends the bill to the President, he has 10 days to sign or veto the measure. If he takes no action, the bill automatically becomes law at the end of the 10-day period. Conversely, taking no action once Congress has adjourned constitutes a “pocket veto” of the bill.

If the President vetoes the bill, he sends it back to Congress. Congress may override the veto by a two-thirds vote in both houses. If Congress successfully overrides the veto, the bill becomes law. If Congress is unsuccessful, the bill dies.

Home | About NCCEP | Programs & Services | Policy & Advocacy | Events | Resource Center | What's New(s)
Calendar | Update Contact Information | Contact Us | Site Map
National Council for Community and Education Partnerships
Copyright © 2004 National Council for Community and Education Partnerships. All rights reserved.
Developed by Advanced Solutions International, Inc.
Underwritten by SBC